Auth fragment styling#21
Conversation
|
Yeah, I like the idea. So what do you think about adding something like a CSS property to the blueprint? |
|
Jakob will chime in on this one, with v3 in mind maybe. |
I much agree. I've been looking for a minimal-class kinda framework that can provide default styling and easily be removed without leaving a mess of unused classes. Currently I like Milligram but am open to alternatives or adding some |
|
Jakob, milligram looks just fine. How about including it into base, it's 2KB and really brings a lot to the table? Even being a Tailwind user myself, I can see benefits of including a lib like that to introduce some styling for the user. I mean, we import all these testing libs and stuff, it wont affect npm install times at all. |
|
@alesvaupotic it should be already included by default. Should we add a comment to it that clarifies its purpose? |
|
@jakobrosenberg Just ran |
|
Ah. You only get it by default if you run The |
|
OK, but you can't assume either that preselected fragments will end up in the user's output. I always deselect milligram in favor of tailwind, this is what I get: So, it would be of great help if either some general styling is applied for any output generated by stackmix or there is no styling at all. I haven't digged thru repository to see when Auth fragment got internal styles, but now it's a mess. |








I did what I could with styling to not change the whole concept. Protected page was set up with inverted theme and some global styles also messed with inputs.
We might think of a global css which can be deleted or updated on demand and each fragment would contribute to initially. It's a simple and quick way to replace styling in general on a new project.
Added a link to
/protectedroute as there was none.